logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.05.18 2015고단1608
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a receiver of the number of days of business, and the victim C was engaged in the business of manufacturing precious metal for dental use under the name of "E" in Busan Shipping Daegu D, and the victim was aware of the defendant and the defendant was paid with money from the days of business around May 2013.

With the knowledge that the victim is in need of urgent transfer, the defendant was aware of the situation, and the victim was willing to deceiving the victim as if he were to lend funds by means of a loan against security, a loan against house security, a prompt-term car tin, etc., and acquired money from the victim

1. On October 18, 2013, the Defendant would sell and sell the vehicle to the victim who suffered from the defect that the victim was urgently required to pay the money at the above E office around October 18, 2013.

The amount of the vehicle was set up by selling money, and the value of the vehicle was paid in full monthly installments to the capital.

However, even if the defendant had the victim purchase used cars, he had no intention or ability to sell used cars on which the right to collateral security of the capital company was established, and to prepare money.

The Defendant deceiving the victim as above and caused the victim to purchase the last car in the name of G by using the F, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 13.8 million as the capital of Hyundai Capital around October 20, 2013. On October 18, 2013, the Defendant was transferred KRW 2 million from the victim to the Saemaul Bank account (H) under the pretext of the purchase and resale of the said vehicle.

2. On November 21, 2013, the Defendant entered into a lease agreement with the victim at the office above E, “After entering into a lease agreement with an adequate apartment under the name of the Plaintiff, the Defendant entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant, and subsequently, entered into a false contract with the Defendant for the lease of KRW 70 million under the lease agreement with the financial right.

However, the defendant is under the pretext of a charter contract from the injured party.

arrow