logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.05.11 2018고단311
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of 10 months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 7 million won.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2018 Highest 311"

1. Defendant A

A. Defendant A sold used cars to the victims who need the loan, and sold them, and made them false as if they lent the remaining money after settling the installments, and had the victims purchase them in a used cars, and had them sell them at will by receiving the delivery.

Defendant

A A around January 11, 2017, at the Internet portal site “I may lend a vehicle as security” at the Internet portal site “Is knowledge.”

The victim E, who reported and contacted the notice ", if he/she purchases a used motor vehicle in installments, he/she will sell it and resolve the side loan and lend 1.7 million won.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”

However, in fact, the defendant A was thought to use the vehicle as living expenses after selling the vehicle at the low price in the large lane with the delivery of the vehicle, and there was no intention or ability to repay the installment loan.

Nevertheless, Defendant A, as seen above, had the victim deceiving the victim, and had the victim purchase the same amount of money by borrowing KRW 10 million from the capital capital through B at the automobile trading complex located in the center of the Macheon-si around January 12, 2017, and then received the above vehicle in an amount equivalent to the same amount under the name of repayment of installment loans, etc. from the capital capital, and received the above vehicle under the same name of repayment of installment loans, etc. from the time until December 17, 2017, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table, from that time until December 17, 2017, and then received it again.

B. On January 14, 2018, Defendant A, on the Internet portal site, issued a written statement to the effect that “a person who wishes to grant a loan” posted by the victim G, and Defendant A made a false statement as if he/she made a loan by phone call to the victim with the victim as security.

However, in fact, the defendant receives a vehicle and uses it at the low price.

arrow