(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.04.27 2016가합1821

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.04.27 2016가합1821

회계결산안건결의 무효확인

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Basic Facts

Pursuant to the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter referred to as the “Urban Improvement Act”), the Defendant is a promotion committee organized to establish an urban environment rearrangement project association in Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, Seoul (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project zone”) in order to implement an urban environment rearrangement project.

The Plaintiff is the owner of the land within the instant business area.

Resolution on Accounting Settlement

5. Agenda 1: (1) Agenda 1: Case No. 2: Case No. 3: Case No. 4 of the amendment of the Operational Rules of the Promotion Committee: Case No. 5: Case No. 6 of the Organization of the Election Commission and the Approval of Election Procedures: Case No. 7 of the Appointment of the Promotion Committee: Case No. 8 of the Appointment of the Commissioner: Case No. 9 of the Selection of the Promotion Committee: Case No. 10 of the Resolution of the Borrowing and the Resolution of the Settlement of Accounts: Case No. 11 of the Settlement of Funds: Case No. 10 of the Resolution of the Settlement of Accounts: Case No. 11 of the Resolution of the Settlement of Accounts: Case No. 10: Case No. 11 of the Selection of the Residents' General Meeting: May 31, 2016; Defendant shall be present at the General Assembly of Residents; and on June 18, 2016, Defendant shall be publicly announced as follows:

(1) The general assembly of this case held that “The 542 persons who agreed to the composition of the Promotion Committee shall have 253 written resolution from among the 542 persons who agreed to the composition of the Promotion Committee, and 275 persons who participated directly in the meeting and became members of the Committee,” and the Defendant shall be “case of settlement of accounts” from 2010 to 2015, the agenda item of subparagraph 1 (hereinafter “instant agenda item”).

(1) The instant agenda was adopted in accordance with an affirmative vote 243 votes, 56 votes, 35 votes, votes, and invalid votes on the agenda en bloc presented to the agenda items from 11 to 11, and the voting was carried out, and the instant agenda was resolved. Article 20 of the relevant regulations (resident general meeting 1 to all the owners of land, etc.) shall be organized.

(2) A general meeting of residents shall be required by the chairperson.

참조조문

-도시 및 주거환경정비법

유사 판례

-서울고등법원 2019.10.02 2018나2055051

-서울남부지방법원 2018.09.14 2017가합105723

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.12.01 2014가합550265

-서울행정법원 2015.09.17 2013구합63537

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.07.09 2015가합502119