The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is erroneous in the misunderstanding of facts or in the misunderstanding of legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment, even though the Defendant, at the time of filing the appeal, did not have any fact that he had a plastic book sticked on the floor, but did not inflict bodily injury upon the victim as stated in the judgment below.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., ① the victim from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, even though there is a little disagreement with regard to the number of plastics sticking by the defendant, the victim was in a serious dispute with the defendant as to the office of licensed real estate agents preparing for the same business as the defendant reported the suspension of business, and thereafter, the defendant was gathering plastic sticking, etc. on his/her face that he/she was faced with the victim, and then he/she was suffering with the victim's left face face. ② The victim's photograph taken on the day of the instant case shows that the victim's face was clearly selected from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, and the victim could not be seen as having actually received medical treatment due to damage to the face of the victim's face, and the victim's statement and face cannot be seen as being sufficiently consistent with the defendant's own statement and the above facts.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit.