The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and legal doctrine, and thereby convicted the Defendant, by misapprehending the legal doctrine, even though there was a fact that the Defendant had inflicted the victim with plastic cosmetics at the time and place recorded in the facts constituting the offense in the lower judgment, on the ground that there was no fact that the instant cup was broken up.

B. The sentence sentenced by the lower court to the Defendant (two years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 사실 오인 및 법리 오해 주장에 대한 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정 즉, ① 이 사건 당일에 촬영된 피해자의 얼굴에 난 상처 사진에 의하면, 피해자의 얼굴 상처는 약간 길게 피부가 찢어진 것으로 날카로운 물건에 의하여 베인 것으로 보이고, 피고인이 주장하는 화장품이 담긴 플라스틱 통에 의하여 발생한 것으로 보기는 어려운 점( 이와 관련하여 피해자는 원심 법정에서 ‘ 피고인이 주장하는 화장품이 담긴 플라스틱 통은 이쑤시개 통처럼 가벼운 플라스틱 재질이고, 크기는 보통 여자들의 손 한 뼘 정도 된다’ 는 취지로 진술하였는바, 플라스틱 통의 재질과 크기 등을 감안하면 더욱 그러하다), ② 피해자는 이 사건 당일 아침에 경찰에서 최초로 조사 받으면서 피고인이 소주병을 깨뜨리고 휘둘러서 상처가 생겼다고

The statement was made with the police officer in charge in order to confirm the scene of the case and to the effect that the defendant was injured by overcoming the cups on the same day, and under the second investigation on the same day. The second statement was made by the victim, although the victim was under the influence of alcohol, the victim was found to have been under the influence of alcohol, but he was stated immediately after confirming the scene and directly identified the commission of the crime, and the credibility of the statement is found to exist. ③ The victim and the victim confirmed the scene together with the victim.