logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.05.14 2015고단439
재물손괴
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On November 21, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective, deadly weapons, etc.) at the Seoul Southern District Court (Seoul Southern District Court) and completed the execution of the sentence at the Seoul Southern District Court on April 23, 2013.

【Criminal Facts】

On February 6, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 10:50 on February 6, 2015, 2015, the Defendant: (b) 3 Dong-ro, Guro-gu, Seoul and 800-60 Southern-ro, and (c) on the ground that wages were not paid, and damaged the waste can not be repaired by 360,000 won of the market price owned by the Guro-gu Office on the news report block.

Around February 23, 2015, the Defendant destroyed a large glass (a) equivalent to 200,000,000 won in the market value of the Seoul Urban Railroad Corporation owned by the Seoul Urban Railroad Corporation, which was installed on the wall of the Defendant, on the ground that the liquor is bad, around 8-lane 2, Nam-gu, Guro-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City Do Do Do 3, 8-ro 2, Nam-gu Ga, 7, and 8-ro Ga, Ga, and 150,000,000,000,000,000,000,000).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. A H statement;

1. Goods purchased and requests, and investigation report on confirmation of the amount of damage;

1. All on-site photographs;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: References to criminal records and investigation reports (applicable to the previous records and investigation reports attached to the same judgment);

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. Among concurrent crimes, the reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act recognizes the defendant's mistake, and submission of counter-influence to this court. However, even if the defendant is under the period of repeated crime due to previous violent crimes, he/she committed each of the crimes of this case without having to participate in a simple assessment. Such circumstances together with the above circumstances, the sentence is imposed in consideration of all the conditions for sentencing, such as the degree of damage caused by each of the crimes of this case, the criminal records, age, character and conduct, and circumstances after the crime.

arrow