logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
대전지방법원 2015.02.13 2014고단4418
부정수표단속법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 4418] From October 18, 1994, the Defendant entered into a check contract with the Sungsung-dong National Bank Pungdong-dong, Daejeon, and traded the coefficient check.

On July 31, 2014, the Defendant issued a check number E, face value 1,613,000 won, and one check issued on November 1, 2014 at his own name bank household check at the time when the date of issuance is when the holder of a check makes a payment to the national bank’s relics branch, but the check was not paid due to the shortage of deposit, and until September 30, 2014, the Defendant issued a check at the same place as indicated in the attached list of crimes and presented a payment proposal within the period of time when the payment was made, and the check was not paid due to the shortage of deposit or the suspension of transaction.

[2015 order 239] From October 18, 1994, the Defendant entered into a check contract with the Sungdong-dong National Bank Sungdong-gu, Daejeon and traded the coefficient mark.

1. On September 2, 2014, the Defendant issued a check number F, par value 5,00,000, and one copy of the household check issued on December 2, 2014 at the D agency office operated by the Defendant, Seosung-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, Daejeon, issued a check number F, face value 5,00,00,00, and the date of issuance. A check was presented to the Defendant on December 2, 2014, when the holder of the check presented a payment proposal to the National Bank’s historical branch during the period of payment, but the check was not paid due to the disposition of transaction suspension.

2. On October 31, 2014, the Defendant issued a check number G, face value KRW 5,000,000, and one copy of his household check with his own name as of January 3, 2015, which was issued on the date of issuance, at the same place, and on January 5, 2015, the holder of a check presented a payment proposal to the National Bank’s relics branch during the period of presentment for payment, but did not pay the check due to a disposition of suspension of transaction.

Summary of Evidence

[2014 Highest 4418]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each accusation [2015 Highest 239] 1.

arrow