logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.08.14 2014고단2150
부정수표단속법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From January 19, 2002, the Defendant entered into a contract with the 3 Daegu Industrial Complex and Family Check with the National Bank from January 19, 2002 and traded checks.

around August 16, 2013, the Defendant issued one check number “E”, face value “5,00,000 won”, and “one household check on January 31, 2014” as of the date of issuance at D offices operated by the Defendant, which was located in Glindong-gun C, and presented a payment proposal on February 3, 2014 during the period of presentment for payment, but did not receive due to the shortage of deposits.

In addition, the Defendant issued a total of KRW 35,00,00 in the family check seven times, such as Nos. 1, 2, 4-8 of the 1 crime sight table, and issued a payment proposal within the payment proposal period, but each holder did not receive due to shortage of deposits or suspension of transactions.

2. From January 19, 2002, the Defendant entered into a check contract with a branch of the Daegu three Corporation of the National Bank and the Defendant from January 19, 2002, and entered into a check contract under the name of the branch of the National Bank and the Defendant with the number of shares.

On October 28, 2013, the Defendant issued one copy of the above household check in the name of the Defendant, which became “F”, “five million won”, “three million won”, and “three one day” in the name of the Defendant, at the D office operated by the Defendant in the Gluribuk-gun C, the Defendant issued one copy of the check.

On March 31, 2014, the Defendant did not receive a disposition of suspension of transaction even though the said check was presented to the above bank on March 31, 2014.

From around that time to December 10, 2013, the Defendant issued three copies of household checks (total sum of 15 million won) as shown in the separate sheet of crime No. 2, and presented payment of each check within the respective period of payment, but did not receive the suspension of transaction.

Summary of Evidence

[Fact 1]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written accusation (record 2,4, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 pages);

1. The report of investigation (as to the date of issue and place of issue of the check) is set forth in paragraph 2;

arrow