logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.05.27 2013고단4140
부정수표단속법위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months and by imprisonment for two years.

However, this judgment is delivered to the defendant A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are married couple, and they have been operating Empt in South Yang-si D.

1. On March 9, 2007, the Defendant issued one copy of the check number check number “F”, “F”, “16,500,000,000,” and “date of issuance” under the Defendant’s name, and the said check holder issued one copy of the check number per bank on October 26, 2013, which is within the time limit for presentment of payment, on October 28, 2013, while the Defendant concluded a check contract with the U.S. branch office of the National Bank and traded the check number per unit. Around August 6, 2013, the check was not paid as suspension of transaction.

In addition, from around that time to November 3, 2013, the Defendant did not pay three copies of the check amount of KRW 76,500,000 as the check amount indicated in the attached Table 1 list of crimes.

2. Defendant B [Defendant B]

A. From June 8, 2001, the Defendant issued one copy of the bank household check in the name of “G”, the check amount “5,000,000 won”, and the date of issuance “A” under the name of “B” on May 13, 2013, when the Bank entered into a check contract in the name of B and B and traded household checks, and the Defendant issued one copy of the bank household check in the name of B, which was within the period of time when the holder of the said check presented payment, but was not paid as a disposition of transaction politics.

In collusion with A, the Defendant issued 22 copies of household checks equivalent to the total sum of KRW 107,00,000,000 from around that time to November 3, 2013, as indicated in Nos. 1 to 7, 9, and 23 of the List of Crimes 2, from around that time, and did not receive deposit shortage or transaction suspension.

B. From March 9, 2007, the Defendant related to the check of a national bank entered into a check contract in the name of the main office of the National Bank A and entered into a check contract in the name of the main office of the National Bank B, and around June 18, 2013, the check number “H” and the amount of the check.

arrow