A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On April 18, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 2.5 million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Busan District Court on April 18, 201, and on April 4, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 2.5 million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act, and the Defendant was sentenced to a imprisonment of 6 months for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act on at least two occasions.
1. On October 2, 2017, the Defendant: (a) violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) and the Road Traffic Act (drinking without a license); (b) around 02:40 on October 2, 2017, the Defendant driven a cub car in C, while under the influence of alcohol with approximately 6km alcohol content of about 0.064%, without obtaining a vehicle driver’s license, from the front side of the main station located in the north-dong of Busan-dong, Chungcheongnam-dong, Seoul to the front of the 906-dong apartment.
2. On October 2, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 03:07, the Defendant: (b) issued a false statement report to the driver; (c) on October 2, 2017, around the 906-dong apartment of Geum-dong, Geumdong, Busan; (d) issued a demand for presentation of a driver’s license while under the influence of drinking from the head of the police station D belonging to the Busan Northern Police Station; and (e) issued a request for presentation of a driver’s license; and (e) issued the name and resident registration number of the friendly F with no driver’s license; and (e) issued a false statement to the head of the police station E, who knows that the above entry is identical to the facts; (d) notified that the license was suspended due to the primary driving; and (e) notified that blood may be collected if recognized and unjust as a result of the measurement
The name of “F” is stated in the driver’s statement column stating “F”, and the document was written and presented to E after signing.
Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant, without authority, forged the driver’s statement column in the driver’s statement report, which is a private document on the confirmation of the facts in the victim F’s name, and used forged private document by presenting it to the horse E who is unaware of the forged fact.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Inquiries into the results of the crackdown on driving under drinking;