logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.08.10 2018고단1136
사서명위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Crime of Crimes】 On February 17, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 8 months or 2 years of suspension of execution, with prison labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) on the grounds of a crime of forging a private document, a crime of forging a private document, a crime of forging a private document, a crime of forging a private signature, a crime of forging a private signature, a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license), a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license), a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license), and a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving with a drinking), from the vice branch of the Incheon District Court on April

7.27. The ruling becomes final and conclusive and is still in the period of suspension of execution.

[Criminal Facts]

1. The defendant, who violated the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license), has not obtained a driver's license of a motor vehicle even though he/she had the same history of driving two or more times as above, and is under the influence of a motor vehicle on March 16, 2018.

From the street to the front road in the Dong-dong from the street to the road in the same city, Cran-car was driven with approximately 3km alcohol concentration of about 0.108% in blood while under the influence of alcohol.

2. The Defendant, as described in paragraph 1, was aware of the personal information of the pro-Japanese F when driving a motor vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license, and had concerns over being detained due to the same type of punishment when driving the motor vehicle while driving the motor vehicle while driving the motor vehicle, and driving the motor vehicle from the police station guard E belonging to the D, and thus having a view to using the F’s name by gathering the F’s name.

The Defendant, in front of the school that had been located in the Dong-si, Pyeong-si, and Dong-dong, demanded the Defendant to state his personal information from the Speaker E, and the Defendant stated “F” in the driver’s statement column of “the driver’s statement in the circumstances of the driver in the State” with the view of exercising the right as F, and then forged “the driver’s statement in the circumstances of the driver in the State” in the above F’s statement, which is a private document on proof of fact, and genuinely written to the Speaker E, who is aware of the forgery.

arrow