Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, each of the defendants B and C shall be punished by a fine of 6,00,000 won.

Defendant

B and C, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

1. From September 2009 to February 2, 2016, Defendant A, the director of the publicity office of the victim I Financial Holding Company and I Bank Co., Ltd. (hereinafter collectively referred to as “I Financial Prop, I Bank, and I Bank,” collectively referred to as “victim Company”), is a person who actually takes charge of all the tasks related to social contribution projects, such as formulation of a project plan, conclusion of a contract, execution of project expenses, preparation for event, etc., and Defendant B is a person who actually takes charge of overall tasks, such as formulation of a project plan, execution of a contract, preparation for event, etc., related to social contribution projects, such as helping the victim company to assist neighbors. Defendant B is a person who was working for the defendant C from April 201 to March 2012, 201, and from April 3, 2014 to November 2015, 2015.

Defendant

A, one of the J Agricultural Cooperatives in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si and one third degree of sisterhood relationship with K (L) and M (hereinafter “JF”), is engaging in a business of helping neighboring people (hereinafter “instant business”), which supplies agricultural rice, K production Kimchi, etc. and contributes to social organizations through M (hereinafter “JF”), the victim company was engaged in a business of helping neighboring people (hereinafter “the instant business”). As one of the JF, JF, one of the JF, set project costs, including the unit price for supply of Maart, rice, and Kimchi, and when concluding a contract, there was a duty to have the victim company pay the project cost according to the contract amount.

Nevertheless, in violation of this duty, Defendant A made the victim company set the amount of the project cost in excess of the project cost contracted with JFF to pay the victim company to MFE as one of JF. In addition, Defendant A received the difference between the project cost that was paid in excess of the project cost that was paid in excess of the actual contract cost as requested in advance to N, Defendant B, Defendant C, etc. as one of JF. In short, Defendant A received the difference from the project cost that was paid in excess of the project cost that was paid in excess of the actual contract.

Defendant

A A A on January 25, 201, one of the J agricultural cooperatives around J around 201, with the point manager N exceeding the contracted project cost.