logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2020.07.03 2019나106772
공사대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for this Court’s explanation is added as follows, and it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of the first instance, except for the dismissal, thereby citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

No. 3 d.

The phrase “13,500,000 won” referred to in paragraph (1) is added to the phrase “one hundred thousand won (principal: 10,500,000 won; 3,000,000 won). The phrase “in the course of the instant construction work” referred to in paragraph (6) of the fourth part is added to the phrase “in June 2017.”

A. The court of first instance rendered a judgment against the Defendant on the charge of claiming KRW 39,960,00 for delay concerning the instant construction contract against I, who is the Plaintiff’s wife, and the court of first instance rendered a judgment against the Defendant (Seoul District Court Decision 2018Da338, Apr. 16, 2019), and the Defendant appealed, but the Defendant’s appeal was dismissed, and the said judgment became final and conclusive (Seoul District Court Decision 2019Na107423, Apr. 22, 2020) (Evidence 46 (No. 7))). Further, the part of the “instituting” until the 6th sentence 3 through 4 of the 6th sentence (No. 7 evidence) was “the Plaintiff and the Defendant brought a lawsuit against the instant case.”

2. Determination of the first instance court is justifiable, and the Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed for lack of justifiable grounds.

arrow