All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) are dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne individually by each person.

1. The reasoning for this Court’s explanation is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following modifications, and thus, it is also acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. On the part of the amendment of the first instance judgment, the first instance court’s amendment to Defendant B, and the conjunctive Defendant as Defendant C, respectively.

A. The lower court’s judgment (Seoul Western District Court Decision 2019No603, Dec. 19, 2019) was rendered in the appellate trial following the Defendant C and the Prosecutor’s appeal, and the lower court’s judgment of dismissal of one party was rendered in the final appeal trial following the Defendant C’s final appeal (Supreme Court Decision 2020Do612, May 14, 2020).

In addition, “A evidence No. 9” should be added to the third [based grounds for recognition]. “The Plaintiff’s assertion on the Plaintiff’s claim against the principal lawsuit” under Article 20 of the 3rd 20th 1st 2nd 2nd 4th 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 3rd 4rd 4rd 4rd 4rd 4rd 4rd 12st 4rd 4th 201 to read “ May 14, 2019” to read “ May 15, 2019.”

A. The 5th page 13 of the 5th page “50 million won” was cited as “20 million won.”

A. In addition, the first instance court’s fact-finding with the President of the first instance court’s first instance court (“I Bank”) added “The remainder of the sales payment by telephone to the Plaintiff, the seller, and the Plaintiff, who is the co-owner other than the Defendant B, is not reasonable to recognize that Defendant B was not paid with the amount corresponding to the Plaintiff’s share.”

A. “The 6th end of the 16th page” is from May 27, 2017, the day after the Plaintiff filed a criminal complaint against the Defendant C.