1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning of this court's explanation is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following addition and replacement among the reasons stated in the judgment of the court of first instance. Therefore, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

In the last 18th page, “(the land subject to sale on the left side of the road of this case among the indication of the drawing)” is added. Each “this court” in the second 19th and third 15th 19th 15th 2nd 18th 2nd 18th 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 3rd

A. The 3rd page 20 of the 3rd page 20 of the 3rd page 20, “any phenomenon” of the 4th page 1 of the 4th page 1 in the form of “satis.”

A. The lower court added “(i) the land subject to sale and purchase and the road site on which Defendant C applied to the head of Hongsung-Gun on May 2014, 201,” and “(ii) the written application for consultation on development activities on development activities on the 1,600 square meters of the road site,” which is 1,600 square meters from the permission date of the project period, to “from April 30, 2016.” As such, the first instance judgment is justifiable, and thus, the Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed.