1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasons for the court’s explanation concerning this case are as follows: “Nos. 1, 2, 6, and 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance” shall be “Nos. 1, 2, 6, 7, 10, and 11 of the five pages of the judgment of the court of first instance”; “The fact that the appeal is pending in the court of final appeal after its dismissal on May 9, 2019,” “The appeal was dismissed on May 9, 2019, but the appeal was dismissed on August 14, 2019 and became final and conclusive as it was,” and “The Enforcement Rule of the State Contract Act of 12 and 7” of the 12th five pages of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be “Nos. 1, 2, 6, 7, 10, and 11 of the Enforcement Rule of the State Contracts Act (Amended by Ordinance of the Ministry of Strategy and Finance No. 751, Sept. 17, 20197” of the former Enforcement Rule of the Act. 16.

(2) The court of first instance, which rejected the plaintiff's claim on February 2, 200, is justifiable, and the court of first instance, which rejected the plaintiff's claim on the ground that the plaintiff's claim in this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion. Thus, the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.