1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court in this case concerning the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the judgment of the court of first instance is dismissed as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of

(Other contents asserted by the Plaintiff in this court are not significantly different from the contents asserted by the Plaintiff in the first instance court, and even if all of the evidence submitted to the first instance court and this court were examined, the judgment of the first instance court that rejected the Plaintiff’s assertion is justifiable). The five pages “Nos. 1, 2, 6, and 7” were cited as “Nos. 1, 2, 6, 7, and 10.”

The 5th page 2 through 1 of the 5th page from the 5th page, “the fact that the appeal is pending in court” was lodged with the Supreme Court Decision 2019Do7234, but the appeal was dismissed on August 14, 2019, and became final and conclusive as it is.”

13 The Enforcement Rule of the State Contract Act (amended by Ordinance of the Ministry of Strategy and Finance No. 751 of September 17, 2019) shall be applied to six (6) pages.

16 Under 16, the "Enforcement Rule of the Act on Contracts to which the State is a Party" shall be amended to "Enforcement Rule of the Act on Contracts to which the State is a Party (amended by Ordinance of the Ministry of Strategy and Finance No. 751 of September 17, 2019)".

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.