Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:20 on January 15, 2014, the Defendant was found to be in the C Hospital Emergency Service Center located at C Hospital B at the Gangwon-si, the Defendant sought explanation of the amount of money and the treatment for injection from the victim D(the age of 33) of the department of emergency medical services at the medical center and received the explanation from the director of the department of emergency medical services at the time of the above medical center, and the Defendant was unable to be hospitalized at this time due to the lack of a sick room, and the Defendant’s statement that “the Defendant was unable to be hospitalized at this time due to the lack of a sick room at this time,” and the Defendant’s statement that “the son was inside the body, and how the son was aware of, and how the son became aware of the son’s hospitalization, and how the son was aware of the son’s son’s dynath, and it was difficult for the Defendant to take the 1st century and the dynath for 5 minutes.”

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim and interfered with the patient treatment service of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (Interference with Business, Selection of Fine) and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act (within the scope of the sum total of the amounts of the punishments determined by the crime of interference with business heavier than the punishment) among concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order leads to the crime of this case by contingency, and the fact that the defendant committed a crime and reflects against the defendant is more favorable. However, as the defendant collected a set of money in the reception stand in addition to the bath, and used a tangible force, such as threatening the vehicle, and as the defendant cited the arms, the crime of this case is being treated for an emergency patient.