The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Basic Facts

Defendant B, C, and D are the persons operating the Fsung Medical Center (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Hospital”), and among them, Defendant B is the intention of the representative director of the Defendant Hospital to directly perform the malicious surgery against the Plaintiff, and Defendant E is the intention of taking charge of the anesthesia surgery against the Plaintiff.

On September 2010, the Plaintiff contributed to the television program called “G” to a female with the same mother as a male, and on October 22, 2010, the Defendant Hospital’s website made a proposal to disclose the surgery information about himself/herself, but provided support for the peripheral surgery, and the Defendant B accepted the Plaintiff’s proposal and provided it free of charge.

As of January 21, 2011, the medical personnel of the defendant hospital for the plaintiff

4. 21. X-ray inspection, February 23, 201, and written an operating programme for the Plaintiff on the basis of the results of the said inspection.

From April 25, 201 to 21:30 on April 25, 201, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital performed the surgery, the surgery, the peripheral leapment, and the optolution, etc. (hereinafter “instant surgery”) against the Plaintiff. After the surgery, the Plaintiff’s vitality was stable after the surgery, and there was a normal opinion on the result of the examination of the optoma that was performed four hours after the surgery.

On April 26, 2011, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital removed the amount of excreta on the part of the Plaintiff’s operation, and performed the training and tracking observation for the Plaintiff. On April 27, 2011, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital confirmed that there was no abnormal signs after conducting the training and tracking observation again, and discharged the Plaintiff.

The details of the specific treatment against the plaintiff from April 29, 201 to July 19, 2011 after the instant surgery by the medical staff of the defendant hospital stated in the medical records of the medical records of the defendant hospital are as follows:

On April 29, 2011, 201, the date treatment content is carried out, photographic, photographic, taken on March 02, 201.