beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 6,946,133 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from May 21, 2011 to December 4, 2014, and the following.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The defendant is an incorporated foundation that operates the Gwangju German Hospital (hereinafter "the defendant hospital"), and the plaintiff is a patient who has been subject to an internal inspection by the captain at the defendant hospital as the plaintiff was admitted to the defendant hospital.
B. Around June 26, 2008, May 20, 2010; May 3, 2010; June 3, 2010; and April 18, 2011, at the Defendant Hospital, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as a large-scale more more more at B Hospital on June 16, 2009.
(2) On May 17, 201, the Plaintiff entered the Defendant Hospital into another dypology removal surgery and signed the written consent for the removal of the dypology at the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the dypology and received an inspection of the dypology.
C. From around 16:00 on May 17, 201, the occurrence and treatment (1) of the Presidential Decree No. 11000 on the part of the Plaintiff’s Guide Drion (hereinafter “Scemmoon”) occurred on the part of the Plaintiff’s Guide Spon (hereinafter “Scemmoon”). Accordingly, the medical personnel of the Defendant hospital carried out the Cmmmosis that embly embly combines the ceiling of the Defendant’s Y with the inner cemmothmp by using hemmocle.
(2) At around 17:20 on May 17, 201, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital explained to the Plaintiff’s guardian about the Plaintiff’s cohesion, the Plaintiff’s cohesion, the CT inspection of clothes, the sagthy, and the sagrogate inserted outside the Plaintiff’s guardian so that liquid remains in the mouth.
(3) Around 17:30 on May 17, 201, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital conducted the Plaintiff’s re-examination, and thereafter performed the Plaintiff’s re-exploitation of the lag in the lag of the lag, and the Plaintiff hospitalized the Plaintiff at the Defendant Hospital to observe the progress, and began to administer the anti-vection to the Plaintiff.
(4) On May 17, 201, at around 18:00, the medical personnel at Defendant Hospital explained that there is no symptoms to infecte the Plaintiff at the present with the Plaintiff’s or the Plaintiff’s guardian, but there may be a need for an emergency surgery in the event of symptoms such as clothes and heat in the future.