(영문) 광주고등법원 2016.08.10 2014나13364

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주고등법원 2016.08.10 2014나13364

손해배상(의)

Text

1. The part concerning Defendant F and G in the judgment of the first instance, including the selective claims added at the trial, shall be:

Reasons

1. The scope of the judgment of this court in the first instance court against the Defendants: (i) KRW 25,00,000 (i.e., KRW 15,00,000 of the deceased K’s share of consolation money 10,000,000 of consolation money 15,000), Plaintiff B, and C respectively (i.e., KRW 10,000,000 in the portion of the deceased K’s share of consolation money 10,000; (ii) KRW 17,286,100 in the portion of the deceased K’s share of consolation money 10,00,000 in the portion of the deceased K’s share of consolation money ; (iii) KRW 10,00,00 in the portion of the deceased K’s share of consolation money ; and (iv) the court dismissed the Plaintiffs’ claim for consolation money 15,00,000 won in the first instance court; and (iv) the Plaintiff’s claim for consolation money 35,0000,5000.

With respect to the judgment of the first instance court, Plaintiff A, B, C, and D had lost part of the lost part (i.e., KRW 20,000,000 in the portion of the lost part (i.e., KRW 10,000 in the portion of the deceased K’s inheritance of KRW 5,000,000 in the consolation money and KRW 5,000 in the funeral expenses of KRW 5,000 in the portion of the deceased K’s inheritance of KRW 10,000 in the consolation money) and damages for delay thereof, each of the appeals was appealed, and the Plaintiffs appealed against the Defendants at the trial, as damages for violation of the duty to explain were added to the Plaintiff’s claim for payment of KRW 25,00,00 in the damages for violation of the duty to explain against the Defendants.

(A) The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff A, B, C, and D, and the part of the judgment against the plaintiff E within the scope of objection of the plaintiff E, and the part of the claim for damages caused by the violation of the duty to explain to the defendants, which were selectively added to the judgment of the court of first instance, are the scope of the judgment of this court.

2. Basic facts

A. The parties 1) Defendant F is the J Hospital in Gwangju Mine-gu L (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

The president of the hospital shall be the other Defendants.

유사 판례

-전주지방법원 2017.07.21 2016가단30595

-광주고등법원 2016.8.10.선고 2014나13364 판결

-인천지방법원 2018.07.11 2017나68762

-서울남부지방법원 2017.07.13 2017나52700

-서울고등법원 2015.09.18 2015나2024926