1. The part of the judgment of the first instance, including the claim extended or reduced in the trial, against the plaintiffs is as follows.

After the remand, the judgment of the trial court prior to the remand of the case was partially accepted by the plaintiffs and other plaintiffs' claim of consolation money before remanding, and only the defendant appealed against this. The Supreme Court reversed and remanded the part of the defendant's judgment of the trial court prior to remanding the part of the consolation money of the plaintiff AE, AF, AG, AH and AI, the part of the deceased EW's portion of the consolation money of the deceased U, the part of the deceased EW's portion of the consolation money of the deceased U, the part of the deceased's portion of the consolation money of the deceased T, the part of the consolation money of the plaintiff BN, BR, BS, BU, and Q.

Therefore, among the judgment of the trial court prior to remand, the part against the other plaintiffs in the trial prior to remand and the part against the defendant against the plaintiffs except for the above reversed and remanded part is finalized. The judgment subject to the trial prior to remand is limited to the part against the defendant in the judgment prior to remand, which was reversed and remanded.

Basic Facts

On July 1950, after the outbreak of the Korean War, there was a case in which the news report members and preliminary prosecutors in the area of the Sinsansan-do, Chungcheongnam-do, and the North Korean War were sentenced to punishment without following legitimate procedures, such as trial by the police, soldiers, etc. (hereinafter “the case of the Sinsan-do," hereinafter). ② On July 1950, the case in which inmates and news report members were detained in the Jinsan-do, and were sentenced to punishment without following legitimate procedures, such as trial by the police, soldiers, etc. (hereinafter “the case of the Silsan-do, Chungcheongnam-do”) occurred. ③ At the time of the Korean War, 108 residents in the area of the Silsan-do, Seoyang-do, Seoyang-do, Mancheon-do, who were residents of the area of the Silsan-do, were killed in the military without following legitimate procedures, such as trial by the police, soldiers, etc. (hereinafter “the case of the Silsan-do”).

The Act on the Settlement of Historys for Truth and Reconciliation is not more than .