logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.01.13 2016가단107617
건물명도
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. The Defendants are listed in the separate sheet Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 3 among the real estate indicated in the separate sheet No. 3, 4, 5, 6,

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of approximately KRW 232 square meters in the part of the ship (hereinafter “instant store”) connected in sequence of each point indicated in the attached Form 3, 4, 5, 6, and 3 among the real estate indicated in the attached Form 3, among the real estate indicated in the attached Form 3, and the Defendants are the owners of approximately 232 square meters in the part of the ship, who operated a marina shop in the instant store as his/her business, and

B. On February 8, 2011, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with Defendant B and C, setting the deposit amount of KRW 50,000,000 per month, and the period of KRW 2,00,000 per month (excluding value-added tax) and the period from February 8, 2011 to May 20, 201, and received the delivery of the instant store around that time.

On February 25, 2012, the Plaintiff and Defendant B and C concluded a lease agreement with respect to the instant store as of February 25, 2012, setting the period of KRW 2,400,00 (excluding value-added tax), and the period of KRW 2,60,000 (excluding value-added tax) as of May 25, 2013, and the lease agreement setting the period of May 25, 2014 as of May 25, 2014, and the period of KRW 2,60,000 (excluding value-added tax) as of May 26, 2014, each of which was stipulated as of May 20, 2015.

C. On May 20, 2015, the Plaintiff was Defendant B and C and B.

On May 25, 2015, upon the expiration of the lease contract term as stated in paragraph (1), Defendant B entered into a lease agreement with Defendant B, setting the deposit amount of KRW 50,000,000 for the instant store, and the period of KRW 2,60,000 (excluding value-added tax), and the period of May 25, 2016 for the instant store.

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). D.

The plaintiff's beginning of March 2016

4. Around 26.26. Around the same day, Defendant B expressed his intent not to renew the contract under the same conditions as those stipulated in the instant lease agreement.

E. The Defendants are as follows: B and D each month to the Plaintiff.

The defendant C has paid the difference to be paid under paragraph, and the defendant C has maintained it until the date of conclusion of the pleadings in this case after completing business registration with the store of this case as the place of business around February 201.

arrow