1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of Plaintiff E is as the deceased H (hereinafter “the deceased”), and the remaining Plaintiffs except Plaintiff E are the deceased’s children.

Defendant F is an aggregate map that takes charge of extracting and preserving cryprypism (hereinafter “the instant surgery”), including taking dyprypism against the deceased, who is neither I nor J professor nor JL Hospital, and Defendant G was a full-time lecturer of the said hospital, who subsidized Defendant FF at the time of performing the instant surgery against the deceased.

B. (1) During the process of the instant surgery, the Deceased: (a) sought to establish K Hospital because of the lack of further construction and fire extinguishing around June 2010; and (b) as a result of an internal and external test on the Deceased, conducted at the time of the instant hospital, there was a possibility that the Deceased might develop into the said cryption; (c) on July 6, 2010, the Deceased was transferred to the IO branch of the Knam University Hospital working for the Defendants.

(2) On July 9, 2010, on the part of the Chonnam University Hospital, an internal test on the deceased was conducted on July 9, 2010, and as a result, the examination confirmed that there was a trajectal disease on the side of the upper body of the deceased, and confirmed that there was a tradic disease on the side of the upper body of the deceased, and based on the organizational examination and cinematographic examination, the operation was necessary on the deceased’s guardian, and explained that the operation was to be conducted

(3) On July 28, 2010, the Deceased was hospitalized in the Southern Hospital, had blood pressure control and stability. From around 08:45 on July 30, 2010 to 14:35 on the same day, the Deceased performed the instant operation for 50 minutes and 50 minutes under the general anesthesia. Under the Defendant G G’s aid, the Defendant F inserted an amount of excreta above the part of the Deceased into the literature for the purpose of performing food-factory coloning the body of the Deceased and connecting food and factory (the body below 200s), and for the discharge of the storage amount in the mouth.

C. After the instant surgery, Defendant F performed the Deceased’s condition and the third surgery (1) on July 31, 2010.