logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 2017.12.29 2015나1535
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The parties 1) The defendant is affiliated hospital to the E Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

(2) On August 12, 2012, the Plaintiffs were children of F (G students, hereinafter “the deceased”) who died at the Defendant Hospital, and Plaintiff A reported the renunciation of inheritance to the Deceased on November 8, 2012 as the Gwangju Family Court 2012-Ma1849, and the said court accepted the said report on November 26, 2012.

B. On July 3, 2012, the Deceased was diagnosed as having been hospitalized in the I Hospital located in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju for the purpose of treating the lap escape symptoms, and on July 4, 2012, the Deceased was diagnosed as having been absent from the lapitis and the laposis. Accordingly, on July 4, 2012, the Deceased was diagnosed as having undergone an examination at the Defendant Hospital, and was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital on that day. 2) On that day, the Deceased was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital on July 5, 2012 on the following day, under the care of D, he was hospitalized with the laposis and the lap thereto. D was performing an operation by using the laposis, and D was performing the operation on the first time and completed the operation after he was flaping the laposis and rearcing the lap.

(hereinafter referred to as “the First Operation”). C.

1) On July 7, 2012, after the framework of the first operation of the instant case, the Deceased was confirmed to include sapex from the liquid fluids installed in the mouth of the Deceased at the time of the first operation of the instant case on July 7, 2012. At the time of the first operation of the instant case, it was confirmed that DNA was a business trip due to the participation in the academic conference, and D was a business trip under the J medical specialist belonging to the Defendant Hospital, and therefore, it was confirmed that the sapex was carried out in order to verify the suspected part of the accident, and that there was a need for a re-operation. 2) However, at the time, D was a business trip due to the participation in the academic community.

arrow