logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.05.04 2017나387
기타(금전)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: Gap evidence submitted additionally in the court of first instance which is insufficient to acknowledge the plaintiff's assertion is rejected; and since the corresponding part of the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning of the court of first instance except for the use of the corresponding part of the court of first instance as stated below, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The phrase “this Court” in the second and third sides of the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be read as “military acid support of the Jeonju District Court”.

In the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance, the phrase “at the present appellate trial is in progress” means “the plaintiff appealed against it, but was dismissed on July 20, 2017, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on August 23, 2017.”

3. According to the conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow