Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 8, 2016, at around 03:57, the Defendant damaged the property by drinking at “E” operated by the victim D, the Defendant: (a) under the influence of alcohol, and thereby driving away from the police station; (b) the police officer, who was waiting for the police station to sit at the seat of the carter and was waiting for the police station, destroyed five products worth 49,500 won of the market price, such as “F” owned by the victim, by throwing the display stand out to the outside of the carter; and (c) the police officer, who was waiting for the police station, was able to break up the carter, thereby destroying five products.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph (1) and on the same grounds as the description thereof, was reported while waiting for the police, and sent out of the Hadsan Police Station G District belonging to the Hadsan Police Station, which was called out after receiving a report, thereby going out of the Hadkter.

D. The C.C. C. C. H’s breath was salked with the balth’s balth and the balth’s h’s h’s h’s bals.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officials on the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D and H;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 136 (1) and 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), the selection of each fine (the first crime, the point of violation of depth, the point of violation of depth, and the point of agreement with the victim D, etc.);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.