logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.07.12 2017고단1271
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year and for six months, respectively.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On February 21, 2017, the Defendant damaged property at the point of “E” operated by the victim D, the victim D, who was under the influence of alcohol, was unable to take a bath, and the victim was able to escape from the disturbance, and the victim was able to demand that the victim move at the facility and move at the facility, and caused the damage of property equivalent to 4050,000 won at the market price owned by the victim.

B. Interference with the performance of official duties and the Defendant’s injury above

1. (a) When a victim H (35 years old) who was a patroler belonging to the Southern Police Station G District Unit of the Southern Police Station, called out after receiving a report that spawn spawns down at the main place at the same time and place as Paragraph (a) prevents a police officer from performing his/her legitimate duties concerning the maintenance of order, and at the same time, the victim h (35 years old), who was a patroler belonging to the Southern Police Station G District, so that he/she prevented a police officer from performing his/her duties by making it possible for him/her to use his/her left eye on his/her hand, and at

2. Defendant B’s defendant at the same time and place as the above 1. Paragraph 1.

1. B. As stated in the foregoing paragraph, the police officer of the Haan Police Station G G District of the Haan Police Station, at the time of the Haan, arrested A as a current offender due to interference with the performance of official duties by a police officer of the Haan Police Station G District of the Republic of Korea, and interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender of the police officer of the Hakne kne and Habbbbbbbb.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. Each police statement made to H, I, D, and J;

1. The K's statement;

1. A report on investigation, evidence photograph, notification to the department reporting the 112 Incident, and a medical certificate;

1. Application of ctv evidence to screen pictures and screen pictures and screen pictures screen pictures with the closure of screen pictures;

1. Defendant A of the pertinent legal provision pertaining to the facts constituting an offense: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injuring an injury) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of destroying an asset): Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A with ordinary concurrence: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act (the crime of obstructing and injuring the performance of official duties).

arrow