A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 2, 2017, at around 13:30, the injured Defendant, on the front side of the “D cafeteria” located in Busan Yagu, Busan Ya-gu, caused the Defendant to bring the plastic garbage bags dumped on the way to the victim E (the age of 47). On the hand, the Defendant and the victim were in a dispute with the victim for the reason that the Defendant brought about the plastic garbage bags on the way to the victim E (the age of 47). On the hand, the Defendant, on the hand, caused the injury, such as the elbane, left knee, and the reflect on the part above the back of the victim’s head.

2. On June 2, 2017, at around 13:50, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the same place as above, and at around 112, G, a police officer affiliated with the Busan F Police Station, who was called upon 112 reported, arrested the Defendant as an injured offender and attempted to board the Defendant on the patrol vehicle, and the said G, stating that “I am bom bom bom bom bom bom bom bom bom bom bom bom bom bom bom bom bom bom bom bom bom bom bom bom bom bom bom bom bom bom bom bom bom bom on the floor of the above G, was

The Defendant continued to get off the patrol car to the above F box located in Busan Ha, which was located in the Busan Ha, and demanded the above G to get off the patrol car from the patrol car.

Dozkkn by forced drawing.

“I am the floor of the above G at 2 times with the hand floor while taking a bath due to the word, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statements of E and G;

1. Investigation reports (on-site situations, etc.);

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant did not have committed any act identical to the facts charged in the instant case, but it is sufficient to find the defendant guilty of the facts charged in the instant case in full view of each evidence presented in the summary of the evidence above. Thus, the above argument is without merit.

Application of Statutes

1. Criminal facts;