The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant received a request from D to alter D's resident registration certificates in order to use D's identification cards verification procedures.

On April 25, 2015, at around 19:00, the Defendant modified D’s resident registration certificate in a way that “G” in “F” in front of D’s resident registration number without authority from the Defendant’s office located in the apartment apartment in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu Northern-gu without authority and attaching a transparent strawer printed with “H”.

The defendant, in collusion with D, altered one resident registration certificate of D in the name of the Gangwon-do Taek market, an official document, for the purpose of uttering.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. Written Statement;

1. Application of seizure records and photographs statutes;

1. Articles 225 and 30 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Six months of imprisonment to be suspended;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act of suspended sentence;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;

1. Where the grounds for special consideration exists in the area of mitigation (4 months to one year for imprisonment) of category 1, such as the application of the sentencing guidelines (the scope of recommendations), forgery, alteration, etc. of official documents, etc. (the organization of non-business expenses) (special imprisonment for four months to one year), commission of a crime, or motive for a crime;

2. The crime of this case, which is a public document, shall not be deemed to have undermined the public trust in the resident registration certificate, which is an official document, and the accused’s liability for the crime of this case cannot be deemed to be

However, there is no evidence to deem that the Defendant committed the instant crime once again to recognize all the instant crimes and reflects his mistake in depth, that it is the first offender, that the Defendant is only 19 years of age, that the Defendant was merely 19 years of age, and that he used the altered resident registration certificate for other illegal purposes, and that there is no other evidence to deem that he used the altered resident registration certificate for other illegal purposes. In addition, considering various sentencing factors indicated in the instant argument, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, intelligence and environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and circumstances after the crime, it is an adult of the side.