Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding 2.5 million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Punishment of the crime

On September 1, 2016, the Defendant, who was released from his position at the director of the E Viewing Eup’s office (local office Grade 5), was working as the head of the E Viewing Management Team from July 1, 201 to December 31, 2014, and was engaged in the overall management of the E market and the Vice-head’s operating expenses for E Viewing from July 1, 201 to December 31, 201, was willing to pay 500,000 won per employee, even though he was planned to pay 300,000 won per employee.

1. Preparation of a false official document;

A. On September 14, 2013, the Defendant drafted a false official document on September 14, 2013, in the E viewing accounting division located in G in E Si around September 14, 2013, and in the official document pertaining to the payment of encouragement money to the E market performance secretary, etc., the title “the encouragement of the staff of the department in charge of the mid-to-site work (on-site work)” is “the encouragement of the staff of the department in charge of the mid-to-day work (on-site work)”, and the content is to inspire and stimulate the desire of delivering encouragement money to the on-site employees, etc., such as civil petition counseling, performance and driving.

1. Amount: 3,500,000 won (gold hundred thousand won);

2. Date of payment: Seven persons, such as a letter of execution, etc., on June 3, 2013;

4. Method of payment: Payment in cash.

5. Payment classification: The head of the accounting division shall prepare a “market, etc.” and obtain approval from the H of the accounting division.

However, the defendant was a plan to pay a total of 2.1 million won per employee at the expense of a staff member, for 3 million won per staff member.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant prepared a false official document in the name of the head of E-Viewing accounting division, “influence of the staff of the department in charge of the field work (on-site).”

B. On January 26, 2014, the Defendant drafted a false official document in the foregoing E viewing accounting division around January 26, 2014, drafted a public question about the payment of an amount of encouragement for the performance of the E market. The title is as follows with respect to the employees, such as workers, etc. who are on a studio studio studio studio studio studio studio studio studio studio studio studio, and the content is as follows.