Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[2015 Highly 966] On April 3, 2015, the Defendant driven an Oral Sea under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.108% in the blood alcohol level from the Do in front of the Do in Jeju-si to the 5-lane 1, Jeju-si, the Do in front of the Do in the Do in Jeju-do of Jeju-do of April 19:30, the Defendant driven an Oral Sea under the influence of alcohol level of 0.108%.

[2015 Go fixed 957] The Defendant filed a false report with the police by thefting electric dryle in front of Jeju-si B in front of Jeju-si Jeju-si, with the intention of causing the police to send a call to the police, despite 20 days thereafter, the Defendant was willing to file a false report for the purpose of causing the police not arrested the offender.

On April 17, 2015, the Defendant posted a phone in Jeju-si, as set forth in the Jeju-dong Police Station E zone in the Jeju-dong Police Station, and even if the Defendant, who was parked in front of the house around 19:00 on the same day, destroyed the glass of the f1 ton of the freight vehicle, he reported falsely as if other persons damaged the said vehicle, and made a false report to the G G belonging to the E Zone and Ha on the spot, and prepared and submitted a statement of damage.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on handling 112 reports by fraudulent means.

Summary of Evidence

[2015 High Court Decision 966]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Fact-finding reports on drivers of drinking alcohol and inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking alcohol;

1. Related photographs (2015 high class 957);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the place of work, the receipt and handling of accidents, the list of the handling of reported cases by 112, and the map near the site;

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of drinking alcohol driving) concerning criminal facts, the provisions of Article 137 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is due to driving of alcohol and false report.