A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 30, 2017, around 02:05, the Defendant filed a 112 report, stating that C was assaulted in front of the 89-ro 30-dong 808-dong 808-dong 808-dong 201, and that C was under the jurisdiction of the Jeju East Police Station D police box and one other was dispatched to the scene.

Since then, the defendant listens to the horses that "I have withdrawn a large number of alcohol, so I have gone to house" from the above E, and us why I have "I have a man's shot."

“In the end, assaulted on the left side of the above E at one time.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Each statement of F and C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The crime of this case committed by the Defendant on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, which assaulted a police officer on the ground that the police officer’s speech is bad, on the ground that the police officer is bad.

However, considering the fact that the defendant's mistake is recognized, the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, circumstances after the crime, circumstances after the crime, family relationship, etc., the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account the various sentencing conditions shown in the arguments in this case.