logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.06.21 2017나9808
공사대금반환
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to execute the DP World Partnership in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu C, and paid 9 million won as the price for the interior work (hereinafter “the construction work of this case”).

① Of the construction cost of this case, the Defendant paid KRW 2,50,000 for air conditioners, and the Defendant installed air conditioners with KRW 3,00,00 for KRW 200,00 for KRW 200,00 for KRW 200,00 for KRW 300,00 for KRW 200,00 for KRW 500 for the difference (=2,000 for KRW 2,500 for the construction cost of this case) and KRW 2,50,00 for the difference as the Defendant installed a net water conditioner with KRW 2,50,00 for the construction cost of this case. The Defendant paid KRW 50,00 for KRW 2,50 for the difference (=50,000 for KRW 50,00 for the construction cost of this case) to the Plaintiff, and the Defendant paid KRW 3,500,000 for each additional construction cost of KRW 300,00 for the construction cost of this case.

2. The judgment knife, Gap evidence 1-1-6 video, Gap evidence 2-1, 2-3-1, 3-2, and evidence 3 are not sufficient to acknowledge the plaintiff's above assertion. The plaintiff's above assertion is without merit, since there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

3. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow