1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The gist of the plaintiff's assertion was that the plaintiff entered into a lease contract with the defendant and the first floor of the building on the ground of Busan, Busan, (hereinafter "the building in this case"). Even after the termination of the lease contract, the defendant did not refund KRW 500,000 to the plaintiff, and the defendant did not refund KRW 10,000,000 out of the lease deposit to the plaintiff. ② Since the lease deposit was paid after two days after the termination of the lease, damage was incurred to the above interest in arrears. ③ Dur the above lease period, the plaintiff paid KRW 80,000,000,000 and KRW 250,000 with the replacement cost of the new engine, and the defendant paid KRW 250,000 with the replacement cost of the new engine, and the defendant claimed that there was a duty to pay the plaintiff the above removal wage of KRW 250,000,000,000,000 and KRW 61,000,000.

2. In full view of the judgment and the records of Gap evidence No. 3, the plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the defendant on May 4, 2004 on the condition that the building of this case was KRW 50 million and the lease period of 12 months, and thereafter, it is deemed that the above lease agreement was terminated, but the evidence submitted by the plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize other plaintiff's assertion.

Thus, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion and thus, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.