beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. Facts charged;
A. On December 10, 2014, the Defendant: (a) on December 10, 2014, in order to obtain an extension of the due date for repayment of the money borrowed from D at the office of the Defendant Seongbuk-gu Seoul (Seoul) on December 10, 2014, the Defendant: (b) stated that “38,290,000 won (three thousand two hundred and nine hundred and nine hundred and nine hundred and nine hundred and nine hundred and nine hundred and nine hundred and nine hundred and nine hundred and one another”; (c) signed in the debt column as “name E:” and (d) signed in the debt column as “name E:” and signed in the lower part of the above site and forged the instrument borrowed from E with the seal affixed to the name of E, and (e) forged the instrument borrowed from D with the signature of the Defendant and delivered the forged document to D with the intent of exercising the right as above.
B. On March 25, 2015, the Defendant: (a) forged a private document and forged the foregoing investigation document at the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1) on March 25, 2015; and (b) exercised the following: (c) without authority to use a verification pen in order to again extend the due date for repayment of the debt from D; (d) “the due date for payment”; (e) “the amount of the loan (40,000,000”; and (e) “the amount of the loan” as stated in the foregoing paragraph (1); and (e) one copy of the certificate of the loan borrowed in the name of E; and (e) delivered a copy of the certificate of the forged loan to D, i.e.,,, a copy of the certificate of the loan borrowed, without authority, to be exercised
2. Determination
A. In the civil procedure instituted by E, who is the name of the above document, D, D, against the defendant and E, each of the above facts charged was forged.
The facts alleged by the defendant, and the fact that the defendant stated to the effect that he/she should recognize the facts charged, if investigated by the investigative agency.
B. However, the following facts acknowledged by the record, i.e., the E, in this Court, made a false assertion in civil procedure brought by D with the intent to escape from liability, but the fact is the defendant who is the spouse, as the above facts charged.