logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2019.02.19 2018고단2511
특수절도등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for 10 months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 10 million won.

Defendant

B does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On July 19, 2018, Defendant A was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. at the Daejeon District Court on July 17, 2018, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on the 27th day of the same month. Defendant B was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for six months at the Daejeon District Court on May 31, 2018 for criminal fraud.

6.8. The ruling becomes final and conclusive and is still in the period of suspension of execution.

【Criminal Facts】

[Defendant A, B] 2018 Highest 2511

1. On June 13, 2018, Defendant A and Defendant B: (a) around 03:38, 2018, at the E points of the victim’s operation of the Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon; (b) around 03:38, F, his employees opened the convenience store entrance; (c) Defendant A, opened the convenience store entrance; (d) KRW 400,000 of the cash owned by the victim in his/her credit cooperative; and (d) Defendant B, at the expense of KRW 225,000 of the market price held by the victim and kept in his/her custody.

As a result, the Defendants committed a theft of the total amount of KRW 625,000 owned by the victim.

2. On June 6, 2018, at around 08:19, Defendant A thefted KRW 1,180,000 in cash owned by the victim’s bank affiliated with the said cafeteria (hereinafter “Defendant A”) in the “I restaurant” operated by the victim H in Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu. Defendant entered the open window of the second floor warehouse and stolen the cash amounting to KRW 1,180,000, which was located in

The Defendants, “2018 Highest 2681” (Defendant A and J) put false goods on the Internet trading website and conspired to divide them by receiving money from those who wish to purchase.

Accordingly, around October 4, 2017, Defendant A posted a letter to the effect that “galthalian Ethalian Ethalian Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Eth

However, in fact, the Defendants did not have the above mobile phone so even if they receive money from the victim.

arrow