logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 의성지원 2017.07.06 2017고단33
협박
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 11, 2017, the Defendant received some hot water from the victim D who denied the cleaning at the 18th floor of the 18th floor of the Gyeongbuk-do, the Gyeongbuk-do, which was on the way to determine the progress of the Cheongbuk-gun, North Korea, the Defendant had the victim not to go to the death of the Defendant, even though some of the hot water was supplied to the 18th floor of the 18th floor of the Gyeongbuk-do, which was in the way to determine the progress

On January 14, 2017, at around 14:00, the Defendant considered the victim who was cleaning in C confinement Dong around 14:00, and the victim “this Chewing gue is the 21st century of Busan, and the victim can die at once.

“...” On January 15, 2017, around 16:45, the victim is “.................................................

“.....” At around 09:15 on January 16, 2017, the three pages of the confinement Dong C, "....... the bathing time has been exceeded, and the liquor tax is required to be completed.

In order to hear the word "", the victim told "I am fry, bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, fry, fry, fry and fry, who is compelled to assault the victim by drinking by the prison workers who are in prison workers who want to assault the victim by drinking, she was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor anywhere, and the death of this dog shall be discarded.

“.......”

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of D, E, and F [the defendant and defense counsel asserted that the defendant had expressed a desire to kill the victim, but there is no threat by the statement that the defendant would kill the victim.

In light of the overall purport of each of the above evidences, the following circumstances, i.e., (i) the victim had consistently been threatened by the investigative agency to the effect that he/she would kill himself/herself as stated in the facts constituting a crime in the judgment, by consistently taking into account the following circumstances, from the investigative agency to this court.

The defendant is also present in this Court, <2> dialogues between the victim and the defendant in C confinement Dong with the victim E and F are also present in this Court.

arrow