logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.03.13 2015고정37
건축법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Building Act;

(a) A person who intends to construct or repair a building shall obtain permission from a Metropolitan Autonomous City Mayor, a Special Self-Governing Province Governor, or the head of a Si/Gun

Nevertheless, on August 4, 2009, the Defendant started the construction on January 21, 2010, and was approved for use on January 21, 2010, three multi-family houses with the total floor area of 390.23 square meters in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, with no permission, were 4 households with 118.62 square meters in the area of 118.62 square meters in the area of 118.62 square meters in the beginning of September 2013 to the end of the same month, 2 households with 3 floors in the same area as 4 households, and 3 households with the boundary walls in the same area of 118.62 square meters in the area of 3 floors in the same household, and made separate toilets

(b) Any person who intends to extend a building with a total floor area of at least 85 square meters shall obtain permission from the Metropolitan Autonomous City Mayor, the Special Self-Governing Province Governor, or

Nevertheless, the Defendant removed stairs going up from the third floor without permission at the same time and place as the above paragraph (a), made the fourth floor of reinforced concrete structure, installed the fourth floor of reinforced concrete structure, and extended two residential houses of 92.71m2 by installing a room, toilet, main room, and outside entrance door.

2. Notwithstanding the fact that the Defendant violated the Parking Lot Act should establish one annexed parking lot per household with respect to the above multi-family house at the same time and place as the above paragraph (1), the Defendant did not establish five-fifths annexed parking lots for the five households added by substantial repair and extension in the above way.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each entry of the investigation reports;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of each building field inspection table;

1. Relevant Articles 108 (1) and 11 (1) of the Building Act (the point of substantial repair and extension without permission), Articles 29 (1) 1, and 19 (1) of the Parking Lot Act concerning criminal facts, and the construction of annexed parking lots, respectively;

arrow