logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.04.02 2015고정23
건축법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Building Act;

(a) A person who intends to construct or repair a building shall obtain permission from a Metropolitan Autonomous City Mayor, a Special Self-Governing Province Governor, or the head of a Si/Gun

Nevertheless, the Defendant started on May 11, 201 and obtained approval for use on November 7, 201, without permission for three-story buildings with the total floor area of 384.81 square meters in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, the Defendant: (a) two-storys with the total floor area of 384.81 square meters from the end of November 201 to the end of January 201; (b) five households with the same area of 120.7 square meters; (c) three-storys with the same area of 5 households; (d) a boundary wall for a household with the same area of 5 households; and (e) a multi-family house for three households with the total of 10 households by means of separate construction of toilets, toilets, kitchens, and external entrances, respectively;

(b) Any person who intends to extend a building with a total floor area of at least 85 square meters shall obtain permission from the Special Self-Governing City Mayor, the Special Self-Governing Province Governor, or

Nevertheless, the Defendant removed stairs going up from the third floor without permission at the same time and place as the above paragraph (a), made the fourth floor of reinforced concrete with reinforced concrete structure, and extended the residential housing of 100.0 square meters by installing a room, toilet, main room, and outside entrance door.

2. Notwithstanding the fact that the Defendant violated the Parking Lot Act should establish one annexed parking lot per household with respect to the above multi-family house at the same time and place as the above paragraph (1), the Defendant did not establish a eight-eight-eight annexed parking lot for the added eight households after substantial repair and extension in the above way.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Inspection marks of each building on-site investigation, each investigation report, and the application of video Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 108(1) and Article 11(1) of the former Building Act (amended by Act No. 12701, May 28, 201) (amended by Act No. 12701, May 28, 201); and

arrow