logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.05.31 2018고정344
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 14:20 on August 16, 2017, the Defendant stated in the indictment on the part of the victim’s chest in the indictment on the part of the victim’s chest in the course of the victim’s chest in the course of the process of the victim’s elbing with the victim on the ground that the victim does not follow the direction of this work (40 years, south) within the open-site of D wood located in Jung-gu Incheon, Jung-gu, Incheon. However, in full view of the victim’s testimony, damage (Evidence No. 61 of the evidence record), etc. in this court, it is obvious that this is a clerical error, and even if it is corrected without the amendment procedure, it is not likely to interfere with the defendant’s exercise of the right to defense (the Defendant asserted that there was no fact that he had contacted the victim’s body, and the examination was conducted with respect to the assault on the chest in the examination procedure for the

The victim suffered bodily injury such as salt, tension, etc. in the cryp of the cryp of the cryp that requires treatment for about three weeks by committing assault, such as cutting down the victim's breast part by hand, cutting down the victim's chest, frying the victim's chest.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. The witness F’s testimony made in the court testimony to the effect that the Defendant was not at the time of the victim in this court, and the witness F testified to the effect that it was different from the statement made in the police.

However, the time when F stated in the police will be more memory than when I testified in this Court on August 31, 2016, 15 days after the occurrence of the incident.

B. The contents of F’s police statement are relatively specific and relatively different from the victim’s initial statement in the police interrogation protocol (Evidence No. 27 page of the evidence record), and the contents of F’s statement (Evidence No. 48 page of the evidence record) are deemed to have been written by F. The witness made a statement to the effect that the victim and the Defendant were engaged in fating in fats at the beginning of fighting. The witness made a statement to the effect that the victim and the Defendant were engaged in fating in fats).

arrow