All of the plaintiffs' claims that have been changed in exchange in this court are dismissed.

The plaintiffs' total cost of litigation.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

4. The 7th parallel of conduct "," beginning with 8 parallel of conduct, "...... in the process of formulation" shall be followed as follows:

E. On August 17, 2019, the Defendant passed a resolution on a management and disposition plan to classify the Plaintiffs as the object of cash settlement at an ordinary general meeting of shareholders on August 17, 2019, and on February 14, 2020, the head of the Gwangju Metropolitan City Mine Office approved the above management and disposition plan on February 14, 2020."

5. The following paragraph (c) shall be added to the paragraph (d) below of the first one.

"A management and disposal plan of the defendant who, therefore, designates the plaintiffs as a person subject to cash settlement shall be null and void."

2. Accordingly, the plaintiffs' claims that were changed in exchange in this court because they are without merit and all of them are dismissed (the former lawsuit was withdrawn by the exchange change in this court and its judgment of the first instance became null and void). It is so decided as per Disposition.