logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.05.14 2018가합551846
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 30,000,000 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its related amount from November 8, 2014 to May 14, 2019.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The parties to the case are incorporated and operated by the Defendant at C Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”). The Plaintiff is a person who received diagnosis and surgery at the Defendant Hospital, as examined below.

B. On February 2013, the Plaintiff (D) was diagnosed with the Plaintiff and the head of the Defendant hospital’s hospital’s internal guards. Around February 2013, 2013, the Plaintiff (D students) suffered from a lusium and two symptoms. On March 11, 2013, the Plaintiff (D students) passed a RI test on the right brain ( brain livers, two flusiums, and two flusiums) as a result of the RI test conducted on the part of E Hospital on March 11, 2013.

(ii)in the surface of the sea breathal species (in the form of a blood breathal type, the breathal surface of which consist of a single fluoral balothic balothic balothic balothic balothic balothic balothic b

2) On March 13, 2013, the Plaintiff was recommended to undergo brain RI inspection on the part of the Defendant hospital. The Plaintiff did not have any neological abnormal therapy from the medical personnel of the Defendant hospital on the surface of the sea, and there was no possibility of cerebral cerebral epidemism, and thus, the Plaintiff was recommended to undergo a tracking examination after one year.

3) On August 24, 2014, the Plaintiff 10 minutes of her answer to the Defendant hospital, and her 10 minutes of her farcation, and her farcation to the F Hospital in a state of consciousness. As the symptoms of her farcation, hair, and farcation continued while performing pharmacologic treatment after being diagnosed as a shock caused by hepatitis, the Plaintiff was subject to brain her darcation test on October 14, 2014. As the result of the above examination, the Plaintiff her darcation of her darcation and the darcation of her darcation to the Defendant hospital on October 15, 2014. The Plaintiff darcation from the Defendant hospital on the surface of the above RI medical team, and the darcation and increase of the darcation from the Defendant hospital on the surface of the year, and the explanation that the darcation may be considered in the following surgery.

arrow