1. The Defendant: KRW 147,240,846 to Plaintiff A; KRW 5,00,000 to Plaintiff B; and KRW 3,00,000 to Plaintiff C and D, respectively.

1. Basic facts

A. The parties concerned are corporations that establish and operate a Changwon Estima Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) located in 212, Seocho-dong 212, Changwon-dong, Changwon-dong.

Plaintiff

A is a person with two symptoms who has caused a cerebrovassis after leaving the defendant hospital, resulting in a cerebrovassis.

Plaintiff

A centered on A, Plaintiff B’s spouse, Plaintiff C and D are children.

B. On July 4, 2006, Plaintiff A was subject to an inspection of brain CT photographing by visiting the emergency room of the Defendant hospital due to the symptoms of “the same head based” around 05:00 on July 4, 2006. Medical professionals belonging to the Defendant hospital E (hereinafter “Defendant hospital E”) who are the Defendant’s employees, including Nonparty E, etc., are “Defendant hospital medical professionals.”

As a result of the examination, the Plaintiff determined that there was no error in the brain of the Plaintiff A, and the said Plaintiff returned home as is, and (2) Plaintiff A was subject to an examination of brain amount due to the lack of two copies on July 5, 2006.

As a result of an examination of brain dystropha, 29 red blood cells and 1 white blood cells were detected, and the medical professionals of the defendant hospital determined that the detection of red blood cells is not by a prop-hystrophum transfusion, and the plaintiff returned home.

3) At around 19:30 on July 6, 2006, Plaintiff A returned to the emergency room of the Defendant hospital, and the medical personnel of the Defendant hospital diagnosed Plaintiff A as brain poppy and decided to rehospitalize Plaintiff A to observe the progress. At the time of hospitalization, Plaintiff A’s blood pressure was 160/100mH, and Plaintiff A showed oral symptoms around 21:45 on the same day. 4) The medical personnel of the Defendant hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) conducted an inspection, such as the brain spaging (MRI), self-spagic spagic spagrophical surgery (MRI), and the self-spagic spagic spagraphrathy (MDA), but the change of Plaintiff A’s brain poppy surgery in its right-hand poppy surgery, and the change of Plaintiff A’s brain poppy surgery in its symptoms to both sides and its symptoms.