beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2019 Highest 3132"
1. On April 18, 2019, around 18:36, the Defendant embezzled 3677 Incheon Nam-gu, Namdong-gu, Incheon, by acquiring one bank containing one cell phone from the market price in which the victim B lost, and various documents, but did not follow necessary procedures, such as returning it to the victim, and embezzled as he/she thought he/she had.
2. On May 4, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 18:12, at around 18:12, 2019, entered the above E’s name and “F” in his/her own column and issued the Defendant’s name and “F” in his/her own column when he/she requested the Defendant to voluntarily conduct the investigation of the lost articles embezzlement case; and (b) entered and delivered the written voluntary behavior; (c) around 20:14 of the same day, at the Nam-gu Seo-gu Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government Police Station, the above E’s interrogation protocol and the written confirmation of the investigation process; and (d) stated the forgery as “F” in the above document; and (e) issued the above E as if he/she was aware of the forgery.
Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of exercising authority, forged the F's signature without authority and exercised it.
"2019 Highest 3430"
1. At around 03:05 on August 8, 2016, the Defendant discovered and stolen walletss equivalent to KRW 150,000 at the market price consisting of 700,000,000, cash 37,000, and one driver’s license.
2. The Defendant, at around 06:40 on August 8, 2016, at a five team office of the Southern-gu Incheon Nam-ro 290-ro 32 Incheon Southern Police Station, and at the 5 team office of the 32 Incheon Southern Police Station, the Defendant requested to affix his/her signature after confirming the suspect interrogation and the written confirmation of investigation process from the slope J related to the thief case under the above 1. The suspect interrogation protocol is without authority for the purpose of exercising authority.