logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2018.07.25 2018고단456
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 11, 2018, the Defendant: (a) paid money to a family on the front day of the king-si on February 11, 2018; (b) there is no money for the victim C to pay the said money upon arrival at the destination; and (c) there is no money for the victim C to pay the said money.

The term "" refers to the following.

The Defendant is under the influence of alcohol even if the Defendant received a request to return money from the injured party on a taxi;

6. Does it take place.

“I am going to a taxi with approximately 20 minutes of sound, and am to a taxi, and am to sit.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's taxi business by force.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1, and at the same time and place, received a report from the above taxi engineer C, and solicited him to return home from the taxi from F (52 3) in the circumstances belonging to the king Police Station E District of the Gyeonggi Police Station E District of the Gyeonggi Police Station, which was dispatched to the site, and assaulted the chest part of the above F by "I am why the taxi fee would have been raised in the return of the taxi fee."

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the maintenance of public peace and order related to the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of laws and regulations on police statements made to C and F;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 314(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. There is a need for strict punishment in order to establish the State’s legal order with respect to the abusive acts and assaulting acts against police officers on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order.

However, the attitude of the defendant to recognize and reflect the crime seems to be.

It is a primary crime with no record of criminal punishment, and the degree of crime is serious due to contingent crimes.

It is difficult to see it.

. Disturbing operations;

arrow