logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2014.08.08 2014고단176
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 2, 2014, the Defendant, who is driving a C-wing and freight vehicle, driven the said cargo vehicle under the influence of alcohol at around 21:50 on February 2, 2014, and led the 18th century from the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of species

In such a case, the driver of a motor vehicle had a duty of care to prevent accidents due to the failure of accident due to the aftermathing of the aftermath City, but the defendant neglected to do so, and was placed on the right side of the road, and was placed on the right side of the victim D(I, 39 years old) owned by the driver of a motor vehicle and the front side of the left side of the motor vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, escaped without taking any measures to damage the front side of the damaged vehicle repair cost of KRW 142,388,00.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of Drinking Measures) The Defendant driving a wing vehicle C with drinking alcohol at the places specified in the above Paragraph (1) and led to the collection of father of the Defendant, who was in F in the case of permanent residence, by taking the accident and escaping from the accident.

On February 2, 2014, at around 22:45, the Defendant was required to respond to the alcohol test by inserting approximately 20 minutes while traveling while under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking, smelling, faceing, and unbreshing distance, etc., from the G District in the permanent police station, the Defendant, upon receiving a traffic accident report, was deemed to have been driving under the influence of alcohol, by inserting approximately 20 minutes of the alcohol measuring instrument while traveling along the G District in the permanent police station.

Nevertheless, the defendant avoided this and did not comply with the police officer's request for a drinking test without any justifiable reason.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police officer to I;

1. The Acts and subordinate statutes shall include a traffic accident report, estimates, and investigation reports (recognating three-time measuring instruments);

arrow