1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff as a juristic person established pursuant to the National Health Insurance Act is an insurer who provides insurance benefits to the insured under the same Act. The Defendant is a doctor who operates C Council members located in Gangnam-gu Seoul (hereinafter “Defendant Council members”), and D, the insured of the National Health Insurance, is a person who undergoes local inhaled alcohol at Defendant Council members.

B. (1) D decided on June 12, 2013 to undergo consultation with the Defendant Council members and undergo regional inhalement to manage the body.

(2) From around 11:30 to 17:00 on July 4, 2013, the Defendant injected D’s clothes, bucks and sprinks, sprinks, and sprinkines on the sprinkine part of the sprink (in the case of inserting a certain quantity into the body before sprinking in the body, the tissues are unsprinked, inserting in the body, or inserting in the body, making it easy to sprink out or inhale the sprinks, and reducing the blood, etc.) 6,000 cc by inserting approximately 5-6,000 cc in the body of the body, sprinks, and sprinks, and 150 cc in each region where the breast recovered from both spucks are taken into each region.

(hereinafter “the instant surgery” (hereinafter “the instant surgery”) . (3) D d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d e

C. After D’s instant surgery, D complained of the symptoms of parassis, the following day of the instant surgery on July 5, 2013, 2013, including the symptoms of parassis, heat reduction, and loss, and the symptoms of parassis were not serious.

(2) On July 6, 2013, D continued to show the same symptoms and applied to Defendant Council members with the help of their guardians, and the Defendant was in the Defendant’s workplace with D’s ability to take a high time and take a full rest.