beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) paid KRW 9,267,348 to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and its related amount from July 5, 2014 to December 28, 2016.
Reasons
The principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall also be deemed to have been filed.
1. Basic facts
A. On June 15, 2013, the Defendant, on the part of the Plaintiff, provided consultation and treatment on the resolution of the deficit by the Plaintiff, “A dental clinic” (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s clinic”) operated by the Plaintiff for the purpose of consultation and treatment on the resolution of the deficit by the 1, 2, 3 (14, 15), 1, 2 Daegu (16, 17).
(2) On February 25, 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) performed an crypt support procedure and a crypt management (hereinafter “instant procedure”); (b) performed the instant procedure on the part of the Defendant on the same day; and (c) performed the Defendant’s crypt X-ray shooting on the part of the instant procedure. On the following day, the Plaintiff performed the crypt crypt 14, 15, and 17.
B. 1) On June 30, 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) filed a complaint against the Defendant for the production of artificial copy steel products (in the form of a dental and oral structure, recorded in a fluorial form); (b) on July 4, 2014, the Plaintiff implemented a joint acquisition for the production of artificial copy steel products (a determination of the location of the fluoral and the fluoral relationship; and (c) on July 5, 2014, a determination of the degree of the fluoral alteration caused by the fluor’s loss). (b) On July 5, 2014, the Defendant filed an appeal against the fluoral of the instant fluoral and the Plaintiff carried out a fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoration against the Defendant.
3) On July 8, 2014, the Plaintiff continued to conduct disinfection of the instant medical treatment department and to take X-ray photographs against the Defendant, and the Defendant complained of pains, and the Plaintiff prescribed the control of infections. 4) On July 14, 2014, the Plaintiff replaced the healing area subject to the Defendant’s control, and the Defendant continuously complained of pains.
5) On August 5, 2014, the Plaintiff conducted oral photographs to the Defendant, removed a healing area subject, and then minuous mincs (contributent elements are equal to the U.S.A. anti-biotics.).