Imprisonment with prison labor for the crimes of No. 1 through No. 3 in the judgment of the defendant, and for the crimes of No. 4 through No. 8 in the judgment of the defendant, one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence on September 4, 2015 by the Cheongju District Court on August 27, 2015 for the crime of forging signature, etc., and was sentenced to a suspended sentence on September 4, 2015, which became final and conclusive on September 4, 2015.

[2015 Highest 277]

1. A defendant who violates the Military Service Act shall be punished by the same year at the house of the defendant in the voice C in Chungcheongbuk-gun on June 30, 2014;

8. On 19.19. The head of the Chungcheong District Military Affairs Administration’s notice of enlistment in the active duty service under the name of the head of the Chungcheong District Military Affairs Administration to enlistment as a supplement to the 102 supplement in the Enforcement Decree of the Chungcheongnam-si, Chuncheon-si, the enlistment was not conducted within three days from the date of enlistment

[2015 Highest 322]

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle with a gallon as a gallon for violating the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving).

On November 27, 2013, the Defendant driven the said car without obtaining a driver's license from around 12:00 on November 27, 2013, and led the Defendant to drive the said car on the 144-2 Western Highway 38.6 km from the front side of the Western Dondon 38.6 km to the Incheon Dondon-do.

At this point, since a vehicle has been an expressway with a lot of traffic, the defendant engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely manipulating the steering side and the steering gear, and in particular, if it is likely to obstruct the normal traffic of other vehicles running in the direction of changing the course of the vehicle, if it is likely to obstruct the normal traffic of other vehicles running in the direction of changing the course, the driver has a duty of care to not change the course.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected such duty of care and did not verify the vehicle that is proceeding on the nine-lanes, and instead changed the vehicle to the nine-lanes, and received the part of the right door of the Defendant’s vehicle, which was the victim E, driving into nine-lanes, in front of the left side of the FF truck driven by the victim E.

Ultimately, the Defendant is running ahead of the vehicle owned by the victim due to such occupational negligence.